WITH regard to the rejection of the supermarket bids for Tavistock, which seems to delight some people, but would likely disappoint just as many, I feel that some of the reasons given for not allowing them are debatable.

Our town centre that everyone goes on about consists of banks, building societies, estate agencies, phone shops and several empty properties. The food offer consists of the Co-operative, Somerfield and a Spar shop in the post office.

In addition to these we have Creber's and three butchers and two greengrocers. As all these five offer a special service they are unlikely to be affected as much as is claimed. The other retail outlets are unlikely to be either, however, if businesses are, perhaps it could be they do not give the public the service they require ie opening times. Have you noticed how hard it is to shop before and after work in Tavistock?

The second reason given for not allowing Sainsbury was the site was designated for industrial use, which if we are realistic about it, will not happen. The town is often gridlocked and access to it is difficult across the moor from Okehampton and the other route from Plymouth.

There are also several industrial units empty in town, so is there a real need for more? In today's present economic climate should we not be looking at what will actually create employment? It might not be popular, but retail employs large numbers of people.

Besides, any industry that did come would only employ small numbers of people. We also hardly mention the people who already shop elsewhere due to work or because they do not have the choice they want or it is not available. This could be 30 percent or more.

Having worked in the retail trade for 40 years I believe that competition and choice is good for the public and if you offer good service and what they public want you will succeed. We do also have to recognise that people's shopping habits have changed. They want free parking and everything in one place.

K McCarter

4 Deacons Green

Tavistock