IT'S a pity that G Kirkpatrick (Letters, March 10) assumes that Devon County Council does not know about the history of the site of Gem Bridge. The assumption is factually incorrect — which is why I felt the need to put the record straight on this issue.
The name of the bridge, and plans for the scheme, were the subject of a public consultation exercise back in 2004. A staffed exhibition at Horrabridge was followed by a week-long display at Tavistock Library. This revealed a high level of public support for the scheme.
Everyone was welcome to attend, including local historical societies. The exhibition resulted in the choice of the name, 'Gem Bridge', echoing the mining heritage in the valley.
Isambard Kingdom Brunel's imprint on the area is recognised and admired, and it was certainly not overlooked. Six of the suggested names put forward for the bridge referred to Walkham, but a majority of people favoured Gem Bridge. In a democratic fashion, that is what has been supported throughout the project.
No doubt many people would argue that the area's mining history is hardly insignificant, and the area is close to the Cornwall and West Devon Mining Landscape World Heritage Site.
Let's not detract from the importance of this scheme. Cycling has health benefits, it's good for the local environment and can save people money if they ride their bike to school or on their commute.
It will also give a huge boost to the local economy through visitor spending. Devon is one of the country's premier destinations for cycling tourism, and the area around the Walkham Valley can be at the forefront of that.
This exciting project can showcase this part of Devon to thousands of visitors. I would like to think that local residents and businesses will continue to provide their support to help us realise the potential that this scheme presents.
Cllr Stuart Hughes
Devon County Council cabinet member for highways and transportation